English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishConciliarizing Apace
09/14/2013
A closer look at the three SSPX bishops’ Declaration of June 27 shows that it is not as strong as it might at first have seemed.
A closer look at the three SSPX bishops’ Declaration of June 27 shows that it is not as strong as it might at first have seemed.
The document submitted by the SSPX to Newrome as a basis for an SSPX-Newrome agreement is fatally ambiguous. Anathema!
Four previous numbers of “Eleison Comments” (241,247, 249 and 251) are summarized to show how they tie together.
Benedict XVI strove for a false Newchurch, made broader than the true Catholic Church by a false ecumenism of co-existing beliefs.
Behind Vatican II was the false philosophy of the 18th century “Enlightenment.” This makes a Catholic agreement with Conciliar churchmen impossible.
Three further quotes from Vatican II documents show how the Council’s ambiguity is behind Benedict’s false concept of the Church.
The Church is more like a living tree than a pile of golden coins, as Vatican II and Benedict XVI pretend it is.
Several numbers of “Eleison Comments,” working from a recent book in German, will show the Pope’s concept of the Church is false.
If Rome soon presents its decision on the SSPX, as emerging from the Discussions, let the SSPX examine closely any tempting offer.
Benedict XVI’s subjectivism impels him to turn the Faith inside out: Gospel, dogma, Church, society, Christ’s Kingship, the Last Ends.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.