English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishDoctrinal Declaration – II
05/04/2013
A still more detailed analysis of paragraph #7 of the Doctrinal Declaration of one year ago uncovers a terrible cunning with words.
A still more detailed analysis of paragraph #7 of the Doctrinal Declaration of one year ago uncovers a terrible cunning with words.
The seventh paragraph of the Newsociety’s Doctrinal Declaration of last April equals the “hermeneutic of continuity,” which is balderdash!
A famous prayer of St Theresa of Avila, turning wholly to God, is more and more suitable for our times turning away.
The General Chapter’s concluding Declaration is strong on piety but weak on doctrine, with a fatal ambiguity in its doctrinal sections.
To the subjectivist Newchurch true Catholicism, being objective, is a standing reproach. As such, the Newchurch cannot help attacking it.
An essay by one of the four Roman theologians who took part in the Rome-SSPX Discussions shows that Rome’s position is unchanged.
A Vatican insider suggests what Rome will tell the SSPX at their upcoming meeting. But the Rome-SSPX problem lies far deeper.
Benedict XVI tries to interpret Vatican II and Tradition so as to make them compatible, but God’s Truth cannot be bent.
Bishop de Galarreta was not maintaining (156) that the irreconcilable doctrines of Rome and the SSPX can be reconciled. They cannot.
Benedict XVI’s papacy is driven by a false vision of reconciling the Catholic Faith with modern (Enlightenment) thinking. They are irreconcilable.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.