English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishModernism’s Malice – V
06/13/2020
Bad doctrine need not mean good will is bad.
Good will need not mean doctrine good is had.
Bad doctrine need not mean good will is bad.
Good will need not mean doctrine good is had.
The Council’s perfidy had no precedent,
So out of true had man, by Kant, been bent.
Unhooked from the object, minds go very bad.
Church and Society have both gone mad.
In conclusion, Benedict XVI hopes in vain to reconcile Catholicism with the modern world. They can only make war on one another.
Benedict XVI’s subjectivism impels him to turn the Faith inside out: Gospel, dogma, Church, society, Christ’s Kingship, the Last Ends.
Benedict XVI’s basic error in philosophy is Kantian subjectivism. But no subject can change or influence the objective truths of the Faith.
To the argument of EC 198 that Conciliar Popes are still Popes, three objections are laid out and given an answer.
Six errors sum up the doctrine of a ringleader of Vatican II, Fr. Chenu. In brief, man in the place of God.
The author of “Eleison Comments” is happy to spread around several disparaging remarks being directed at him.Enjoy!
Benedict XVI’s papacy is driven by a false vision of reconciling the Catholic Faith with modern (Enlightenment) thinking. They are irreconcilable.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.