English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishSix Conditions
09/01/2012
The General Chapter’s conditions for any future practical agreement with Newrome betray alarming concessions to the religion of man.
The General Chapter’s conditions for any future practical agreement with Newrome betray alarming concessions to the religion of man.
What drives a man’s life is his real doctrine. The Newchurch is driven by a false doctrine of God, man and life.
As a true Mass in false surroundings should be avoided, so should a faithful SSPX tying itself into an unfaithful Newchurch.
A bishop’s gravely erroneous sayings cast in doubt whether July’s General Chapter granted the SSPX anything more than just a reprieve.
Three direct quotes of Archbishop Lefebvre show how the SSPX joining the Newchurch would not convert it, but be converted by it.
The parallels between the official Church being seduced at Vatican II and the SSPX being seduced by the Newchurch, are striking.
Two bad arguments for the SSPX to join the Newchurch are refuted: one from graces of state, the other from Newrome’s distress.
A letter of Archbishop Lefebvre after he consecrated bishops shows what drastic measures he considered necessary to defend the Faith.
By pronouncing that Vatican II’s notion of religious liberty is “very limited,” Bishop Fellay undermined Catholic doctrine and the SSPX.
To the subjectivist Newchurch true Catholicism, being objective, is a standing reproach. As such, the Newchurch cannot help attacking it.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.