English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishArchbishop Speaks
06/09/2012
A letter of Archbishop Lefebvre after he consecrated bishops shows what drastic measures he considered necessary to defend the Faith.
A letter of Archbishop Lefebvre after he consecrated bishops shows what drastic measures he considered necessary to defend the Faith.
By pronouncing that Vatican II’s notion of religious liberty is “very limited,” Bishop Fellay undermined Catholic doctrine and the SSPX.
Four previous numbers of “Eleison Comments” (241,247, 249 and 251) are summarized to show how they tie together.
To the subjectivist Newchurch true Catholicism, being objective, is a standing reproach. As such, the Newchurch cannot help attacking it.
Three further quotes from Vatican II documents show how the Council’s ambiguity is behind Benedict’s false concept of the Church.
A most important paragraph on Tradition from a Vatican II document shows how that Council was two-faced in the worst way.
Back in 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre warned clearly that any merely practical agreement with today’s Rome would divide and destroy the SSPX.
A friend of the Pope appeals to the SSPX to accept the Pope’s offer of unity. Let the Pope rather consecrate Russia.
Before the Episcopal consecrations of 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre did work for a practical agreement with Rome, but thereafter, never again. Never again.
The 20th century’s most outstanding poet in English, T.S.Eliot, sets an example of not pretending that modernity is angelic.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.