English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishYellow Light
01/05/2013
A priest friend of the SSPX watches anxiously its present turn towards Newrome. He no longer fully approves, nor yet fully disapproves.
A priest friend of the SSPX watches anxiously its present turn towards Newrome. He no longer fully approves, nor yet fully disapproves.
SSPX Headquarters has put out an explanation of five puzzling remarks of the Superior General. They puzzle more than ever.
The author of “Eleison Comments” offers for readers’ delight a little collection of counter-comments, many going back to Sweden.
Back in 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre warned clearly that any merely practical agreement with today’s Rome would divide and destroy the SSPX.
A friend of the Pope appeals to the SSPX to accept the Pope’s offer of unity. Let the Pope rather consecrate Russia.
Before the Episcopal consecrations of 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre did work for a practical agreement with Rome, but thereafter, never again. Never again.
In the author’s appeal from two previous condemnations in Germany for “racial incitement,” the case was dismissed on procedural grounds.
An essay by one of the four Roman theologians who took part in the Rome-SSPX Discussions shows that Rome’s position is unchanged.
A Vatican insider suggests what Rome will tell the SSPX at their upcoming meeting. But the Rome-SSPX problem lies far deeper.
If Rome soon presents its decision on the SSPX, as emerging from the Discussions, let the SSPX examine closely any tempting offer.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.