English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishMore Ammunition
10/06/2012
The author of “Eleison Comments” offers for readers’ delight a little collection of counter-comments, many going back to Sweden.
The author of “Eleison Comments” offers for readers’ delight a little collection of counter-comments, many going back to Sweden.
Cardinal Siri was a fine churchman, but by his lack of reaction to the disaster of Vatican II, arguably not fine enough.
The General Chapter’s concluding Declaration is strong on piety but weak on doctrine, with a fatal ambiguity in its doctrinal sections.
Those who seem divisive rebels are not always the real rebels. John VII shows the crowd being divided by Our Lord’s teaching.
The document submitted by the SSPX to Newrome as a basis for an SSPX-Newrome agreement is fatally ambiguous. Anathema!
What drives a man’s life is his real doctrine. The Newchurch is driven by a false doctrine of God, man and life.
As a true Mass in false surroundings should be avoided, so should a faithful SSPX tying itself into an unfaithful Newchurch.
Three direct quotes of Archbishop Lefebvre show how the SSPX joining the Newchurch would not convert it, but be converted by it.
The parallels between the official Church being seduced at Vatican II and the SSPX being seduced by the Newchurch, are striking.
Two bad arguments for the SSPX to join the Newchurch are refuted: one from graces of state, the other from Newrome’s distress.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.