English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishA Chapter
08/04/2012
Compared with the Archbishop’s Declaration of November, 1974, the final Declaration of the SSPX’s July General Chapter is rather weak
Compared with the Archbishop’s Declaration of November, 1974, the final Declaration of the SSPX’s July General Chapter is rather weak
As a true Mass in false surroundings should be avoided, so should a faithful SSPX tying itself into an unfaithful Newchurch.
A bishop’s gravely erroneous sayings cast in doubt whether July’s General Chapter granted the SSPX anything more than just a reprieve.
Three direct quotes of Archbishop Lefebvre show how the SSPX joining the Newchurch would not convert it, but be converted by it.
Two bad arguments for the SSPX to join the Newchurch are refuted: one from graces of state, the other from Newrome’s distress.
Strong words of St Paul castigating the Galatians for back-sliding are easily applied to Newsociety leaders flirting with Conciliar Rome.
A letter of Archbishop Lefebvre after he consecrated bishops shows what drastic measures he considered necessary to defend the Faith.
Four previous numbers of “Eleison Comments” (241,247, 249 and 251) are summarized to show how they tie together.
To the subjectivist Newchurch true Catholicism, being objective, is a standing reproach. As such, the Newchurch cannot help attacking it.
Benedict XVI strove for a false Newchurch, made broader than the true Catholic Church by a false ecumenism of co-existing beliefs.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.