English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishUndignified Dignity
03/16/2013
A reader’s multiple arguments defending Vatican II’s religious liberty are refuted. Its liberating man from God is insanity.
A reader’s multiple arguments defending Vatican II’s religious liberty are refuted. Its liberating man from God is insanity.
One may suspect that Newsociety headquarters are conspiring with Newrome to achieve an agreement. Priests disagreeing should protest.
The General Chapter’s concluding Declaration is strong on piety but weak on doctrine, with a fatal ambiguity in its doctrinal sections.
The document submitted by the SSPX to Newrome as a basis for an SSPX-Newrome agreement is fatally ambiguous. Anathema!
An essay by one of the four Roman theologians who took part in the Rome-SSPX Discussions shows that Rome’s position is unchanged.
Benedict XVI’s basic error in philosophy is Kantian subjectivism. But no subject can change or influence the objective truths of the Faith.
Today’s Romans are, objectively speaking, enemies of the Catholic Church. The laity need to be informed, instructed doctrinally and strengthened spiritually.
Benedict XVI wants to rescue modern man from drowning, but he cannot do it by throwing himself too into the deadly waters.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.