English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishTwo Errors
06/30/2012
Two bad arguments for the SSPX to join the Newchurch are refuted: one from graces of state, the other from Newrome’s distress.
Two bad arguments for the SSPX to join the Newchurch are refuted: one from graces of state, the other from Newrome’s distress.
Strong words of St Paul castigating the Galatians for back-sliding are easily applied to Newsociety leaders flirting with Conciliar Rome.
A letter of Archbishop Lefebvre after he consecrated bishops shows what drastic measures he considered necessary to defend the Faith.
By pronouncing that Vatican II’s notion of religious liberty is “very limited,” Bishop Fellay undermined Catholic doctrine and the SSPX.
Four previous numbers of “Eleison Comments” (241,247, 249 and 251) are summarized to show how they tie together.
To the subjectivist Newchurch true Catholicism, being objective, is a standing reproach. As such, the Newchurch cannot help attacking it.
Benedict XVI strove for a false Newchurch, made broader than the true Catholic Church by a false ecumenism of co-existing beliefs.
Three further quotes from Vatican II documents show how the Council’s ambiguity is behind Benedict’s false concept of the Church.
A most important paragraph on Tradition from a Vatican II document shows how that Council was two-faced in the worst way.
The Church is more like a living tree than a pile of golden coins, as Vatican II and Benedict XVI pretend it is.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.