English
Dutch
French
Italian
SpanishArchbishop Commented – II
01/10/2015
The Archbishop wished Rome not himself to approve, Rather that Rome for the Church’s good would move.
The Archbishop wished Rome not himself to approve, Rather that Rome for the Church’s good would move.
A great Archbishop, forty years ago,
Measured the Council’s doctrine, and said “No.”
In changing times unchanging truths must find
New applications, not to be left behind.
All know what stand is taken by the “Resistance.”
Therefore it witnesses by its mere existence.
The Church does parts from God and man combine.
The human can be rotted, not the divine.
No Catholic need believe that the imminent canonisation of Conciliar Popes will be infallible, because it will proceed from mind-rot.
Pope Francis is giving sedevacantism a new lease of life, but these “Comments” hold that nobody is obliged to hold the See to be vacant.
Four objections to the second and (supposed) third parts of the Secret of Fatima are answered. The Chastisement they evoke is yet to come.
“Pathological” is a modern word used to name a maladjustment to reality. Catholics must recognize how widespread this condition is.
In 1994 one of the four SSPX bishops foresaw the possibility of the SSPX not holding strong but going over to Conciliar Rome.
To a doubting French journalist the author of “Eleison Comments” expresses confidence that the imminent Motu Proprio will do much good.
Indeed, it both declares that the Tridentine Mass was never banned, and permits Latin rite priests to use it, whenever and wherever.
By overloading our eyes and ears, said Kafka, the cinema overwhelms our minds. Minds being overwhelmed means that lies triumph.
In his outstanding Encyclical of 100 years ago, Pius X nailed the deadly error of modern times: minds’ independence from their object.
Despite many Catholics’ reservations as to the content and motivation of the Motu Proprio, one may still believe it will do good.